M. Gigante
To Win
F. Maestrelli
To Win
Federico Arnaboldi vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
W W W L L W L L W WHead To Head: Arnaboldi 0 - 0 Gigante
| Arnaboldi | Stats | Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (10-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 200 | Ranking | 195 |
| 200 | Highest Rank | 132 |
| 24 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 4 | Titles | 5 |
| 56% (199-158) | Career Total W/L | 58% (152-110) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $280,090 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Arnaboldi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Sandro Kopp
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Matej Dodig
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Tristan Boyer
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sebastian Baez
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (199/158) | Win/Loss | 58% (152/110) |
| 54% (443/370) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (344/270) |
| 52% (3892/3629) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3014/2765) |
| 58% (26/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (56/23) |
| 58% (162/115) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (84/60) |
| 31% (11/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 26% (9/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 679 | Aces Total | 819 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1053 | Total Double Faults | 869 |
| 1:26:3 | Average Match Time | 1:33:21 |
| 427.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.52 |
| 59% (11738/19892) | 1st Serve % | 59% (10304/17390) |
| 67% (7829/11738) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (7019/10304) |
| 47% (3852/8154) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3499/7086) |
| 45% (932/2054) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (825/1886) |
| 42% (8099/19409) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7284/17674) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 53% (9/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (48/56) | Challenger W/L | 57% (100/75) |
| 60% (151/101) | Futures W/L | 73% (37/14) |
| 56% (197/353) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (149/254) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 54% (49/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (44/77) |
| 55% (56/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (48/88) |
| 89% (190/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (159/127) |
| 11% (190/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (159/30) |
| 18% (167/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (103/23) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
